Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Username: Password:

Author Topic: A strange design.  (Read 284 times)

RAF_Blackace

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
A strange design.
« on: July 21, 2018, 03:32:57 »

Hello all.

I built myself an equatorial platform for by Dob and it tracks surprisingly well. But not well enough for deep sky astrophotography. But I see no reason why I can't make it good enough to do that.

Some background. I built it from a design I found on the internet. Currently it uses a simple astromaster drive motor at 9.5 revs per hour. This tracks well but as it is a DC drive it does need adjusting as the load shifts.

I am now considering replacing this drive with a stepper motor, also I am making a declination drive adjuster that should give me +-2 degrees declination adjustment.

The ultimate aim is to use auto tracking using PHD2 guiding with guide camera.

So far from being a go-to mount, or having the capability of moving to anywhere, I simply want a solution that tracks using a guide camera.

My Equatorial platform gives me a maximum 1 and a half hours of RA tracking, currently it is incapable of Dec tracking but I'm designing a solution for it.

My question is.

Is ASTROEQ a possible design interface between the tracking camera and the drives (both of which will be stepper motors but would obviously be limited in their possible movements).

I'm at the early stages of the design and looking for help, so any would be greatly appreciated.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2018, 03:53:25 by RAF_Blackace »
Logged

RAF_Blackace

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: A strange design.
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2018, 03:39:18 »

Just to give you an idea of how well it tracks. If I position an object in the centre of an 8mm eyepiece (0.6 degree field of view) after 1 and a half hours it is still in the field of view, albeit it has shifted slightly in declination and RA. The RA could be adjusted by trimming the speed of the RA motor but that is old school. I want to get closed loop control with a tracking camera.

Hoping to get some advice.
Logged

RAF_Blackace

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: A strange design.
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2018, 03:48:39 »

This is a picture showing the simple RA drive train.

1. Drive shaft support.
2. Main drive wheel.
3. Simple Heath Robinson lock to lock the platform in any position.
4. Main drive shaft.
5. Link to drive motor.
6. Drive motor Mount.
Logged

Victor_M

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: A strange design.
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2018, 09:51:38 »

Hi RAF,

I don't know if this can help you, but if you are ussing EQASCOM to interface your mount with the guiding software, then you can define the mount limits. I've atached a pdf file that I've found on internet with some explanations

regards and good luck
« Last Edit: July 22, 2018, 09:53:55 by Victor_M »
Logged

RAF_Blackace

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: A strange design.
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2018, 18:08:47 »

Hi RAF,

I don't know if this can help you, but if you are ussing EQASCOM to interface your mount with the guiding software, then you can define the mount limits. I've atached a pdf file that I've found on internet with some explanations

regards and good luck

Thanks for the information. I can't see any reason why it would not work it theory. I just need to be aware of, or somehow disable to go-to functions as they would simply spin the motors and make the platform go nowhere. Once it's moved to a RA and Dec position I would then need a way of telling the controller it was actually there. Then the tracking would be as normal.
Logged